|
Specialty contractors up in arms over licensing
By Shelia Watson
Contributing Writer
A recent letter of notice from the South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation is causing a backlash of criticism from a collective of plumbers, electricians and concerned citizens in the tri-county area.
The notice outlines changes in the S.C. Residential Builders Commission regulations for specialty contractors, a sector of the labor force that is not licensed but instead is registered with the state and given certificates to perform a limited amount of plumbing and electrical work. The changes require that specialty contractors become licensed by the first of next year.
However, the key phrase in the notice, and the reason for the swift reaction from the plumbers and electricians, is that licensing will initially be without examination for those individuals in good standing who have been lawfully registered and engaged in plumbing (or electrical) for not less than two years prior to July 1, 2005.
Licensing without examination for eligible applicants will expire Dec. 31, 2005.
The letter, which was sent to more than 3,000 specialty contractors across the state, calls for completing an application and submitting a fee of $110 to receive a license.
A mark of authority
For most plumbers and electricians, licensure is the mark of authority and the only way for consumers to avoid hiring unqualified workers.
Its an outrage that theyre allowing these people to just walk in and get a license without examination, says Jay Michel, vice president of Blitch Plumbing and a member of an ad hoc committee made up of members of the Charleston Master Plumbers Association and the Charleston Electrical Contractors Association, which is fighting this change.
If people are going to be doing plumbing or electrical work, they should have to go through testing to prove they can do the work.
Mike Richardson, an officer with the Mechanical Contractors Association of South Carolina, says the specialty program came in effect after Hurricane Hugo, when work far exceeded available labor.
We woke up one day and had another classification of license that didnt require any competency testing, he says. You could go to them with a letter saying you had a few years of experience and could draw a certificate with no competency whatsoever. And with nothing more than that, you could do electrical (and plumbing) work for residential units.
In the course of closing this loophole, however, the MCASC was told by the LLR that the legislation would not go through without grandfathering in the existing specialty contractors by allowing them to bypass the examination process.
We were faced with advice from the LLR that we could not get it passed, said Richardson. And right or wrong, we took them on their word for that. The political reality is that we were never going to get the law changed without the grandfathering component. If we had tried, we would be going to war with the Home Builders Association. And getting that law fixed was more important than fighting that battle.
Grandfathering contractors/b>
John Cone, director of the Home Builders Association of South Carolina, says grandfathering the specialty contractors prevents those who would not pass the exam from being placed out of business. If that happened, we might not have enough qualified people to do the work.
What went into effect in July is that the specialty contractors went from being registered to being licensed, says John Curl, chairman of the Residential Builders Commission, the agency whose regulations have been changed. Eventually they will be required to undergo testing before license. Grandfathering was a provision for people who had previously been in business, and it is allowed as long as the documentation and bond requirements are taken care of.
Curl says the RBC is trying to be consistent with what has been done in the past.
Realize that the people were grandfathering were for the most part people who are in business and doing their trade, following the letter of the law. The feeling with the folks at the state is whether were being fair if we make them take a test after theyve been doing this for years, he says.
The paperwork only that they have to fill out is a lot more involved, and now they have to be bonded and have to get affidavits proving how long theyve been in business. Weve raised the bar significantly, but its hard to go from simply sending in a registration and a fee to being licensed. What were trying to do across the board is raise the bar for professionals across the state. I think were being fair in the process.
Michel, however, says a bigger issue than being fair to the specialty contractors is ensuring the health and safety of the public. Were talking about potable water hereproviding clean, safe drinking water for people. Not to mention working with gas. Its a serious issue.
Curl says the state and the building commission are concerned about the health and safety of all citizens, which is why they rely on the municipalities code enforcement departments for proper inspection. Homes are inspected when theyre built. A homeowner cannot move in without a certificate of occupancy.
However, relying on the municipalities may not be the best method, particularly for Charleston County, whose building inspection office does not recognize the specialty contractors certificate and is reluctant to honor a grandfathered license from them. Our code says anyone doing plumbing, electrical, gas or HVAC work has to be licensed, says Jim Houser, an inspector with Charleston County. And the state law says we may require a residential specialty contractor to be examined and licensed in accordance with standards.
No safety problem?
The HBAs Cone sees no problem for consumers in terms of safety. Heres why it doesnt bother me: Its still the responsibility of the builder to ensure that the job is done according to code. I dont have any fears about the consumers safety at all. New construction has to be approved.
Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Charleston, who was contacted by the ad hoc committee, says the LLR was formed to house disparate licensing entities and was responsible for implementing standards.
Its very unusual to grant a license to individuals who have only been registered, as opposed to passing an exam. We need to make sure the LLR is accurately and properly acting within its authority according to the statute, Campsen says.
The latest word from Tyson Nettles and Patrick Flynn, the attorneys representing the ad hoc committee, is that there is a possibility that the new regulations are contrary to the law and the code.
|