Machinists union mass-mails Boeing S.C. employees

Crews work on a Dreamliner on the floor of the 787 final assembly plant in North Charleston. (Photo/Leslie Burden)
Crews work on a Dreamliner on the floor of the 787 final assembly plant in North Charleston. (Photo/Leslie Burden)

By Matt Tomsic
mtomsic@scbiznews.com
Published Oct. 10, 2012

The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers is hosting a meeting for Boeing South Carolina employees in North Charleston next week, according to documents obtained by the Charleston Regional Business Journal.

“The IAM has maintained contact with supporters at the Boeing South Carolina facility, and they’ve maintained contact with us,” said Frank Larkin, a spokesman for the Machinists union headquarters. “The meeting is for Boeing employees who are interested in finding out more about their collective bargaining rights.”

It will take place Tuesday and is intended for hourly employees who fall under the bargaining unit at Boeing’s North Charleston campus.

The Machinists union mailed information about the meeting to Boeing Co. employees, including a pamphlet with information about labor rights and a card employees could fill out and submit to allow the Machinists union to act as that employee’s collective bargaining agent.

“Contrary to what anti-union politicians say, there’s plenty of workers in South Carolina who like the kind of health care and retirement benefits that only come with a union contract,” Larkin said.

A Boeing spokeswoman said the company is proud of its North Charleston team’s accomplishments and collaboration.

“We’re continuously working on making Boeing South Carolina a place where teammates have a voice and can speak for themselves without having to rely on a third party to speak for them,” said Candy Eslinger in an emailed statement.

Gary Chaison, an industrial relations professor for Clark University, said the meeting is standard procedure for union organizing.

“The Machinists are just examining the potential of organizing the Boeing plant of South Carolina,” Chaison said. “The workers have to make a decision about whether or not they want to be represented by the union, knowing full well in the back of their mind that Boeing moved to South Carolina so they wouldn’t have to deal with a unionized workforce.”

The Machinists union is deciding if it’s worthwhile to start and pay for an organizing drive at the Boeing plant even though South Carolina’s right-to-work law means the union won’t have automatic dues deductions from employees, he said. In South Carolina, employees aren’t forced to join a union that represents other workers, but the employees who don’t join are still covered by collective bargaining agreements.

Chaison said either decision will carry big implications.

“Nothing that happens with Boeing is small,” he said. “It takes on tremendous symbolic and political importance. And so if there is a campaign, it’s going to be looked at as tremendously important. If there isn’t a campaign, it’s going to be looked at as tremendously important also.”

Next week’s meeting isn’t the union’s first venture into the Lowcountry.

In 2007, workers at the former Vought Aircraft Industries plant voted 67-60 to join the Machinists union. But two years later, employees voted 199-68 to decertify the Machinists union; after the vote, a Boeing spokeswoman said the presence of a union or the decertification vote would not impact the company’s decision on the location of the second final assembly line. At the time, Boeing was considering North Charleston and a handful of other sites as locations for a second final assembly line for the 787 Dreamliner.

A month later, Boeing chose North Charleston for its second final assembly plant.

Boeing’s decision eventually led to a complaint filed by the National Labor Relations Board, which argued the new assembly line constituted an unfair labor practice and Boeing’s decision to expand in South Carolina was retaliation against the union in Washington state for past strikes. In the complaint, the labor relations board cited statements made by Boeing executives as retaliation against the Machinists union.

The complaint ignited a firestorm of outrage, and government officials at all levels condemned the NLRB.

The NLRB ended its case against Boeing after the company and the Machinists in Washington state asked for the complaint to be dropped after they reached a new labor agreement in December.

Reach Matt Tomsic at 843-849-3144.

Email Print

Do you give this article a thumbs up? Thumbs_upYes

Comments:

Added: 10 Oct 2012

The union is nothing more than organized crime. If anybody reading this walked into their boss' office and said they would damage the business if they did not get what they wanted, they would be arrested for extortion. Why is it legal for a large group of employees to do it? It's thuggery, plain and simple. Give me what I want, or els.

Thomas


Added: 11 Oct 2012

Thomas, Not to sound insulting, but you are a mis-informed closed minded hick. The union coming in down there is one of the best thing that could happen there.

Stan


Added: 11 Oct 2012

If the criteria for thuggery is as Thomas says, "Give me what I want or else!" then management qualifies for that title right along with unions. In a large corporation there are many opportunities for abusive management practices. HR departments typically defend the company side of these disputes, leaving employees with no advocate unless they pursue the matters in a court of law. Unions give the employee an advocate in such disputes without the risk of losing your job because you brought the issue forward.

Michael


Added: 16 Oct 2012

Stan, You're not in a position to decide what's best for Boeing employees in South Carolina. This decision will be made by the employees, not by outsiders telling them whats in their best interest. Your childish name-calling proves to me that you don't have a valid point to make. Since you can't win the war of ideas you resort to name-calling, is that it? Crawl back to wear you came from, we don't need that kind of attitude in Charleston.

Brian


Added: 16 Oct 2012

Michael, you are absolutely spot on with your point of HR siding with the company and management practicing thuggery at its best. The workers in that facility have no recourse for malpractice and are forced to work outrageous hours of overtime to make up for the already 4year behind schedule program. While the union is not the best answer, it is certainly looking promising given the circumstances.

Andrew


Added: 17 Oct 2012

Boeing's engineers, techs and pilots also have a union on the west coast. www.speea.org

Ray