Nuclear can provide power, economic punch, says development group

By Daniel Brock
dbrock@scbiznews.com
Published May 21, 2010

The Carolinas are national leaders in nuclear energy, but only continued investment and growth will keep it that way. More development also will mean billions of dollars for a region stretching from the Tar Heel State to North Georgia, according to a group that aims to organize and promote the carbonless energy source.

Already, South Carolina is home to seven nuclear reactors that produce more than 50% of the state’s power. Four more reactors are on the way, including two at S.C. Electric & Gas’ $10 billion V.C. Summer station near Jenkinsville. The first is scheduled to open in 2016, and the second is set to follow in 2019.

“Nuclear knowledge here is unparalleled. We either build on it, develop it and grow the economy, or we lose it,” said Scott Carlberg, a communication specialist speaking on behalf of the Carolinas Nuclear Cluster.

The cluster, an arm of New Carolina: South Carolina’s Council on Competitiveness, hosted a meeting this morning in Goose Creek that doubled as a pep rally and an informational session for manufacturers and service providers looking to jump on board the nuclear bandwagon.

The seminar was targeted at manufacturing companies — producing pipes, valves, fittings, electrical systems, HVAC systems and construction materials — and service providers — machine shops; electrical, mechanical and HVAC maintenance; waste cleanup; office maintenance; hazardous materials cleanup; painters; radiological protection; quality control; and laboratory services.

Representatives from SCE&G, Westinghouse Electric Co. — the nuclear power company that’s also part of the V.C. Summer contracting team — and others addressed a full room of executives eager to join the supply train of an industry that some experts predict will grow from $50 billion to $300 billion over the next 15 years.

“It’s a good time to be getting back into the industry,” said Glenn Marcus, a nuclear sourcing manager with SCE&G, who touted the safety and cleanliness of nuclear power.

“Once you prove yourself, it’s a real community,” Carlberg added.

Speakers also touched on the idea of involving younger people in nuclear engineering, as almost half of the nuclear engineers in the Carolinas will be eligible for retirement in 2013.

“That’s a huge gap,” Carlberg said.

Marcus and Dave Eckert, the director of business for Pegasus Nuclear, a branch of steel fabricator Pegasus Steel, detailed the procedures for nuclear procurement, which centered heavily on companies having their information in order before applying for jobs. Safety record and focus on human performance, experience and financial stability were also keys.

Eckert, whose company entered the nuclear market a few years ago, noted in his presentation that materials, equipment and subcontracted services often make up 40% to 60% of a project’s costs.

Some critics of nuclear power debate its safety, and the V.C. Summer reactors were the catalyst for a decade’s worth of upcoming rate hikes by SCE&G.

Meanwhile, Amy Buu, a knowledge management team leader with Westinghouse, said nuclear energy is not only safe but can be an economic driver. She added that the dissemination of information about nuclear power has been difficult, as public perception is colored by the likes of Homer Simpson, the Back to the Future movies and The China Syndrome.

“I’ve been in nuclear for 10 years,” Buu said. “I hope you don’t see a green glow.”

Reach Daniel Brock at 843-849-3144.

Email Print

Do you give this article a thumbs up? Thumbs_upYes

Comments:

Added: 24 May 2010

I have been on board with nuclear power since the late 70's early 80's. It took some work by those that were trying to convince me. As I see it now, 0ur biggest problem is the lack of education for the general public. As the article above states about the seminar, "The seminar was targeted at manufacturing companies — producing pipes, valves, fittings, electrical systems, HVAC systems and construction materials — and service providers — machine shops; electrical, mechanical and HVAC maintenance; waste cleanup; office maintenance; hazardous materials cleanup; painters; radiological protection; quality control; and laboratory services." These meetings are great ideas, but as the article also states; it was targeted at those looking to jump on board the nuclear bandwagon. We do need to go after those thinking about it but who is spending the money to win over the regular working class that is concerned about a reactor melt-down or the cost of living going much higher due to each new nuclear power plant? I’ve heard everything from the cost of bread being higher, to the fear that if accidents were to happen in the right order, we could lose over half the population in the US due to contamination in just a few days. I feel more time and money needs to be spent on the education of everyone. The few adds on TV are not going to get the job done neither will jokes about turning green or belittleing those that are not properly educated. We just need for the polititions to sit this one out and let the experts go forward.

Ron Amick


Added: 25 May 2010

Yes, I give this arcticle a thumbs up. I have been trying to get a job at nuclear plants in SC, GA and NC. I started looking as early April of 2009. I contacted the South Carolina Employment Commission and I was directed to the Savannah River Site. I got the contractors list and I contacted them and sent them my resume'. I also spoke to their consultants but I still came up empty. I am very interested in the nuclear field, I get jobs emailed to me from Nukeworkers and I search Roadtech for jobs and I get Nuclear Office Clerk jobs sent me from Indeed. I read news update from the NEI and search for Tech schools. I have worked as a construction office assistant but I am willing to be trained for another position. If you know of anyone that I could contact, your help would be deeply appreciated. Please email me back. Thanks

April Vega


Leave New Comment