Email Print

S.C. Supreme Court to review challenge to new port terminal


By Chelsea Hadaway
chadaway@scbiznews.com
Published Sept. 11, 2009

The S.C. Supreme Court said it will review the Southern Environmental Law Center’s ability to challenge the proposed port terminal at the former Navy Base in North Charleston.

Calling the decision an important development, Blan Holman, an attorney with the center, said, “We look forward to getting the (Coastal Conservation) League its day in court to explain the serious problems with these permits.”

Byron Miller, spokesman for the S.C. State Ports Authority, said the review is to look at problems the law center and the conservation league have with the procedure for appealing permits to build the new terminal.

Previously, the administrative law court and the court of appeals ruled that the center could not challenge the permits, issued by the Department of Health and Environmental Control, because the challenge was filed outside the 15-day limit.

The law center said its challenges were filed within one business day of the receipt of notice that the permits had been issued.

If the S.C. Supreme Court rules in favor of the law center, it would then be able to go back to the administrative law court and present its case that the permits did not properly account for the water and air pollution the terminal would create, Holman said.

“We look forward to finally being able to present evidence on the impacts of diesel air pollution from trucks and ships on the people living in our Charleston,” conservation league program director Nancy Vinson said.

The latest development comes as no surprise to the ports authority, Miller said.

“We look forward to continue to aggressively defend this project and the permits that were approved by nine state and federal agencies,” he said.

The law center anticipates the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in early 2010.

Previous coverage:


Comments:

Added: 30 Sep 2009

This lawsuit is good for the health of every individual in our community! Tourism is an economic foundation for our city and we should work to improve the quality of our air, water, and greenspace in order to continue to make Charleston more attractive! While a few laws are in place to mitigate damage to the environment it would be absurd to assert that such laws adequately protect our environment. Regarding the port terminal, the permits did not properly account for the water and air pollution the terminal would create. Increased air pollution is positively correlated with increased cases of asthma and other respiratory diseases as well as various cancers. Water pollution destroys our aquatic ecosystems including our fisheries and recreation areas and poisons our drinking water and the fish that we eat. The residents of lovely, historic Charleston will welcome any and all industries that are committed to sustainability and keeping the environment in Charleston and the surrounding area clean and healthy for our children and grandchildren!

BringGreenJobsToCharleston!


Added: 12 Sep 2009

This lawsuit is bad for our economy. The Port of Charleston is the economic foundation for every job in Charleston. At a time when we have suffered 9,000 lost jobs in the region, we should pull together and determine how to help the economic base so we can feed our kids. The laws to protect the environment are in place. The various agencies have reviewed the permits and approved them. Now we have to wait for the court to review? I hope Dana Beach is comfortable in his home while the working class people wait to find if they have a job to support their families.

Jeff


Leave New Comment