Readers favor school choice by 65.8%

By Andy Owens
aowens@scbiznews.com
Published March 27, 2009

Readers who responded to a two-day e-mail poll overwhelmingly said they were in favor of school choice in South Carolina.

Sensing a swell of opinion related to state Sen. Robert Ford’s comments and press conference Tuesday in favor of school choice, SC Biz News asked readers in Charleston, Columbia and statewide their opinions on the issue.

Readers were asked to choose vouchers, tax credits or no school choice, and were then given a chance to comment.

Here’s how the 173 readers answered the question
“Are you in favor of school choice in South Carolina?”

Question

Answer

Percentage of total

1) Yes, by using vouchers

56

32.3%

2) Yes, by using tax credits

58

33.5%

3) No

59

34.1%

All yes (total of 1 and 2)

114

65.8%

Nearly the same number of readers preferred vouchers to tax credits, but when vouchers and tax credits are combined in an “all yes” choice, more than 65% were in favor of school choice. About one-third of readers said they didn’t want school choice in South Carolina, and their comments showed their reasoning.

“This is just a taxpayer subsidy to high-income people that already send their kids to private school,” said one statewide reader. “Our money needs to go to making public schools excellent.”

Another reader who spoke against school choice said it was an issue of socioeconomic class and was unfair to underserved populations.

Related story and more reader comments
Democrat senator calls for school choice in South Carolina

“Public schools are the cornerstone of our democracy. School ‘choice’ is an affordable option only for an affluent class, and ultimately undermines educational opportunity for an underserved population.”

Another reader equated school choice to segregation and brought up a topic that not many lawmakers have discussed: If private schools accept public money, will they be required to follow state regulations?

“Not until these private schools have to have certified teachers, students have to pass all the tests that public school students take and report cards are issued on the school’s performance. Otherwise we have two education systems not unlike we had during the segregation era.”               

Nearly all the readers who were in favor of school choice seemed to think it would help public schools improve.

“Qualifying my answer, I believe in school choice for students in public school assigned to underperforming public schools to choose another higher-performing public school,” said one reader.

“I do favor choice within a district,” said another reader. “The local district in Beaufort will be over run by Jasper students, and we will get nothing in return based on the current formula. If every child had a dollar amount attached, then it would work. But not under the current system.”

Another reader hoping for vouchers emphasized giving students and families a “choice.”

“Choice is the operative word. America is supposed to be about freedom to choose. Vouchers are the best choice, but tax credits would be a move in the right direction.”

Email Print

Do you give this article a thumbs up? Thumbs_upYes

Comments:

Added: 31 Mar 2009

At this point, I wouldn't call it a voucher, but a Tax REBATE.... How do you justify taxing families who live in, let's just say Charleston county. They may want the best possible education for their kids and are willing to sacrifice for it, so they place them in private (christian) schools, and pay the tuition. However we continue to pay taxes to support a failed educational system...? A school choice, with money behind it, will force school administrators to be "accountable"...sorry, a four-letter word these liberal days....

PJM


Added: 2 Jun 2009

Vouchers are simply not the answer if what you want is real choice, and an effective, efficient means of the singular goal we all can agree with: an educated pulic. At some point people need to understand that it is an educated public, not public education, that is the cornerstone of a free society - precisely what the founding fathers envisioned. The latter is the most inefficient and demonstrably ineffective means to accomplish this foundational aspect of a country premised on individual rights, freedom and liberty. By definition, choice implies-subsumes-economic educational choice AND market forces. You may get choices with a voucher, but you will not get market competition. Vouchers carry state strings attached, so the best first step is clearly universal education tax credits. No one should be forced to simultaneously pay for both the education of their own children and the education of someone else's kids. That is immoral and a clear case of tyranny. Embrace choice, but embrace it in the context of a market based education system and not one premised upon a government monopoly.

Bil Danielson


Leave New Comment