Email Print

Time to reboot maritime’s image, retired New Orleans port exec says


By Molly Parker
mparker@scbiznews.com
Published Jan. 16, 2009

Retired port executive Ron Brinson said the Charleston maritime community should take the rapt attention that Maersk’s decision to leave has thrust on the port and turn it into a better understanding of the industry.

“The public does not understand and does not appreciate the value of the port,” Brinson said Thursday to a crowded room at the Charleston Motor Carriers Association’s monthly luncheon at the Sheraton in North Charleston.

Because of that misunderstanding, Brinson said, “we have a port that has been competing with one hand tied behind its back.”

Brinson, now living in Charleston, retired from the business in 2003 after more than 15 years as president and CEO of the Port of New Orleans. A former newspaper editor and reporter in Charleston, Brinson also worked for the S.C. State Ports Authority before leaving for Louisiana.

Much of Brinson’s talk focused on the fallout caused by Maersk Line’s announcement that it would begin pulling services out of Charleston early this year and completely leave town when its contract expires at the end of 2010.

Although the Danish company’s business is extremely important to Charleston and the entire state, the community should not take the news personally, Brinson said.

“These are unemotional business decisions that we sometimes tend to make emotional,” Brinson said.

Charleston, he noted, isn’t the first community to deal with the loss of Maersk, the world’s largest steamship line and the S.C. State Ports Authority’s largest customer.

In 1999, Maersk left the Port of Long Beach in California because officials there could not or would not agree to concessions the shipping company said it needed.

It took about three years, but Long Beach recovered after losing 25% of its business to competitor Los Angeles.

Brinson also warned the group not to heap blame on the International Longshoremen’s Association. Anti-union sentiment seems to have grown stronger nationally in the wake of Detroit’s struggles, he said, and seems even more intense in Southern states, including South Carolina.

The Maersk decision also compounded those feelings because the company said it was moving because the ILA refused to let the company operate from the common-user yard at the Wando Welch Terminal, a move that would have eliminated several dozen union jobs.

People, especially in South Carolina, tend to perceive unions as a four-letter word, he said. “The reality is that unions are a four-letter word at our port, and that word is F-A-C-T.”

In Charleston, he said, union labor has a good reputation. The SPA has a good reputation also, he said, and offered this advice: “Ease up; give the ports authority a little breathing room.”

He had some advice for port executives as well. Brinson said they should be willing to try new operating models and not wait for changes — potentially misguided changes — to be forced upon the port by the General Assembly and governor.

And he suggested that the entire maritime community, including SPA staff members, spend time “rebooting” relationships with the public. If the state is giving off the perception that it does not support its port operations, steamship lines might take the cue and send their business elsewhere.

“Maybe we South Carolinians are sending the wrong message to the marketplace,” he said.

Reach Molly Parker at 843-849-3144.


Comments:

Added: 20 Jan 2009

It seems that the biggest challenge facing people today is acceptance of change. The current status of the United States economic system is here because the majority of Americans in the past assumed that others (political or otherwise) could only operate from a state of conscience for the people. Time has shown that this is untrue, from political leader to the common layman. Unfortunately, our own worst enemies are within our own soils. Nothing in life ever remains the same. Everything is always changing. When we stay in the mind set that change should not occur, we place ourselves into the position of severe discomfort, hopelessness, and ever enduring pain. With that being said, Maersk leaving the port of Charleston may perhaps be the best economic move for Charleston. Who is to say, the future will not bring Charleston greater stability with a different (or many) shipping carriers taking Maersk's place. In these changing global times, fluidity seems to be the only key to living . Whereas rigidness leads to peril.

Just Curious


Added: 16 Jan 2009

Maybe Retired port executive Ron Brinson should tell the people in Charleston about container on barge service. How it would lower freight cost on containers into Greenville, Spartanburg, Charlotte areas. He needs to tell the Unions not to double charge on barges. He needs to tell them that barges could go to Columbia and Augusta. It is time for change and if Charleston doesn't change they will be left behind. The containers will be delivered in the upstate from Mobile up to the Tennessee river system.

bargeman


Added: 16 Jan 2009

The public has some questions of the port. According to the above article ,“The public does not understand and does not appreciate the value of the port,” Mr. Brinson said. Please help the public understand the port's strategy in this very severe global meltdown. Today, we have 3 container terminals in Charleston that are operating at less than 50% capacity. Maersk is pulling out with another 20+% of our existing volume. And yet , Mr. Brinson keeps emphatically saying we have to build a navy base terminal as soon as possible. It will be the most expensive terminal in the U.S. and yet unlike Maersk's new terminal in Norfolk and the terminal in Savannah, it will not have on dock rail. Please explain to the public how the SPA needs a 4th terminal after this global meltdown ,when if it was incapable of fully utilizing our 3 existing terminals during the boom times. It is obvious to the public that we are making a mistake having taxpayers fork over +165 million dollars for a port access road to a spec terminal with no guarantee of any future business, while other state agencies are having to cut back vital services to our citizens.

truthseeker


Leave New Comment